Brady Campaign Going Bankrupt

A recent posting at the DU posits that the infamous gun banning organization is losing money and has only received one donation of $2,500 so far this year. If so, perhaps Paul Helmke and Petey Hamm will have to stop traveling first class and switch to a cheaper grade of snake oil.

A look at the opensecrets.org page for the Brady Campaign shows that, with the exception of the 1999-2000 donation cycle ($1.7M), the Brady’s have been losing money ever since, and in fact now pay out more money than they receive in donations.

What happened in the 1999-2000 donation cycle to boost donations so much? On April 20th, 1999 two psychopaths stormed their high-school in Littleton, CO and killed 13 people. I find it ironic that 8 years later, at Virginia Tech, 32 people lost their lives and there was no increase in donations. Either the general public has become wise to the Brady’s tricks, or there is some other factor at play here.

Now, with even more guns in public hands than ever before, crime is at an all time low. Whether or not this is the reason for the decline is immaterial, what is important to note, is there has been no increase in crime as a result. Proof positive I’d say that more guns does not mean more crime, proving John Lott right.

Whatever ends up happening to the Brady Campaign, I could care less. I know I certainly won’t be shedding any tears when they eventually disband and go away. Good riddance to bad rubbish I say.

Would the last one out of the building please turn off the lights? Thanks!

Sad Pandas! »« Warning! Founding Documents Ahead!

Warning! Founding Documents Ahead!

Apparently a publishing company thinks the founding documents are dangerous and require a warning sticker.

Story here:

A small publishing company is under fire after putting warning labels on copies of the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence and other historical documents.

Wilder Publications warns readers of its reprints of the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, Common Sense, the Articles of Confederation, and the Federalist Papers, among others, that “This book is a product of its time and does not reflect the same values as it would if it were written today.”

The disclaimer goes on to tell parents that they “might wish to discuss with their children how views on race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity, and interpersonal relations have changed since this book was written before allowing them to read this classic work.”

Walter Olson, senior fellow at the Cato Institute, says the company may be trying to ensure that oversensitive people don’t pull its works off bookstore or library shelves.

“Any idea that’s 100 years old will probably offend someone or other,” Olson told FoxNews.com. “…But if there’s anything that you ought to be able to take at a first gulp for yourself and then ask your parents if you’re wondering about this or that strange thing, it should be the founding documents of American history.”

The warning seems to be offending more people than the documents themselves.

Amazon.com’s customer reviews of Wilder’s copy of the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and the Articles of Confederation show an overwhelming number of people speaking out against the disclaimer, describing it as “insulting,” “sickening” and “frankly, horrifying.”

Another review for Wilder’s edition of the Federalist Papers calls for an all-out boycott of the publisher, sarcastically pointing out the “dangerous ideas” it’s trying to protect children from: “limited government, checks and balances, constrained judicial review, dual sovereignty of states and federal government, and deliberative democracy.”

And though warning labels are usually posted to protect a company from potential lawsuits, constitutional attorney Noel Francisco says this disclaimer has no legal benefits.

“Would it ever be a legal concern that selling the Constitution would expose you to some kind of liability? No. Never,” Francisco told FoxNews.com. “The Constitution is the founding document of the country, an operative legal document.”

As for the idea that this warning label might help keep these works from being yanked off bookshelves, Francisco says it is more likely to have the opposite effect: people not carrying the book because it has the disclaimer.

“By putting on the warning, you’re making controversial something that’s not controversial: our Constitution, our Declaration of Independence,” he said.

Amazon customers appear to agree. Almost all of the reviews discussing the disclaimer end with the same thought: don’t buy from this publisher.

Efforts to reach the publisher were unsuccessful.

(h/t) Snarkybytes

Brady Campaign Going Bankrupt »« Proof The Brady Bunch Are Bigots