Welcome to The Real Gun Guys!
![]() Book for sale!"Nothing" chapters available here for $1 each (first one free) |
Click here to visit our CafePress shop!
Countdown until "The Obamanation" leaves Office
Visit DefeatTheDebt.com to learn more!
![]() Book for sale!"Nothing" chapters available here for $1 each (first one free) |
Countdown until "The Obamanation" leaves Office
Visit DefeatTheDebt.com to learn more!
Posting tweet...
Powered by Twitter Tools
I guess it just goes to show you how much in contempt the Democratic leaders in Washington D.C. hold us. Thanks Nancy for reminding us, yet once again.
Nancy Pelosi is so used to the way her side does things, she can’t conceive of a true grass-roots effort. In fact, she wouldn’t know a true grass-roots effort if it rose up and bit her on the ass.
From The Weekly Standard, quoting Roll Call:
“But in an interview on Fox TV in San Francisco, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) chalked up the GOP grass-roots effort as “AstroTurf.”
“This initiative is funded by the high end; we call it AstroTurf, it’s not really a grass-roots movement. It’s AstroTurf by some of the wealthiest people in America to keep the focus on tax cuts for the rich instead of for the great middle class,” Pelosi said.
Other House Democratic leaders took a different tack: One senior aide has been circulating a document to the media that debunks the effort as one driven by corporate lobbyists and attended by neo-Nazis…
In addition, the tea parties are “not really all about average citizens,” the document continues, saying neo-Nazis, militias, secessionists and racists are attending them. The tea parties are also not peaceful, since reporters in Cincinnati had to seek “police protection” during one of the events, it states.“
This should prove interesting!
From The Volokh Conspiracy:
“Montana’s staunchly pro-Second Amendment Governor, Democrat Brian Schweitzer, has signed Montana HB 246, the Montana Firearms Freedom Act. The bill declares that a firearm which is manufactured in Montana, and never leaves the State of Montana, “is not subject to federal law or federal regulation, including registration, under the authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce. It is declared by the legislature that those items have not traveled in interstate commerce.”
Further, “It is declared by the legislature that basic materials, such as unmachined steel and unshaped wood, are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition and are not subject to congressional authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition under interstate commerce as if they were actually firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition. The authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce in basic materials does not include authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition made in Montana from those materials. Firearms accessories that are imported into Montana from another state and that are subject to federal regulation as being in interstate commerce do not subject a firearm to federal regulation under interstate commerce because they are attached to or used in conjunction with a firearm in Montana.”
For the reasons that Glenn Reynolds and I detailed in the Connecticut Law Review, I think that the Montana legislature is in line with the original understanding of the Interstate Commerce Clause, and with how the clause ought to be read today. But, obviously, that reading is not exactly a sure winner in today’s courts.“