He was a quiet man…
I’ve just recently become aware of this movie. From the trailer, it appears to tell the story of a man on the verge of exploding and killing everyone in his office one day soon. Being well armed seems to have worked out well for him though for when one day another co-worker goes “postal” and begins shooting up the office, he pulls out his own gun and kills the “maniac with a loaded gun.”
I might rent this just to see what kind of slant they put on things, although from the trailer it seems to be more about a romance with a paralyzed co-worker than anything else. We’ll see…
However, I did find something interesting from the movie’s website. This is their advice on how to deal with a “maniac with a loaded gun” at your own place of employment:
Workplace Violence
Unfortunately, regardless of how diligent we may be in our awareness, some of us may someday find ourselves in a crisis situation. So how can you protect yourself and your coworkers when faced with a hostile, potentially violent person?
- Understand the mindset of the hostile or potentially violent person. The person has a compelling need to communicate his grievance to someone now! Give him a verbal outlet. Even if he is wrong, the individual is acting on perceptions that are real to him. In the overwhelming number of cases, the person just wants fairness.
- Practice “Active Listening.” Stop what you are doing and give the person your full attention. Listen to what is really being said. Use silence and paraphrasing. Ask clarifying, open-ended questions.
- Avoid confrontation. Instead, build trust and provide help. Be calm, courteous, respectful, patient, open and honest. Never belittle, embarrass or verbally attack a hostile person.
- Allow a total airing of the grievance without comment or judgment. Make eye contact (but don’t stare). Allow verbal venting of emotion. Let the person have his say (not necessarily his way). Ignore challenges and insults and don’t take it personally; redirect attention to the real issue.
- Allow the aggrieved party to suggest a solution. A person will more readily agree to a resolution that he helped formulate. And it might surprise you that the person’s suggestion may be very reasonable.
- Move toward a win-win resolution. Preserve the individual’s dignity. Switch the focus from what you can’t do toward what you can. With the person’s permission, call in additional resources, i.e., supervisor, Human Resources, Employee Assistance Program, Security, or Police.
Well now, I’ll just get right on that. Notice there is no mention of armed resistance, inarguably the most effective way of stopping the bloodshed and coming out of the situation alive.
On second thought, I don’t think I’ll be renting this movie after all.
2 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^
42 queries. 0.571 seconds.
Powered by WordPress with jd-desert theme design by John Doe.
1,841 spam killed by WP-SpamFree
Powered by eShop v.2
The Real Gun Guys is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache!
Picture changes every five minutes while camera is operating. Refresh to update.



![Validate my RSS feed [Valid RSS]](http://www.therealgunguys.com/images/valid-rss.png)

What about borrowing Clausewitz’s concept about war being diplomacy by other means and see armed resistance as persuasion by other means?
In other words, the gun is the tool; it’s tactics that usually win the day. If you can talk the guy down, especially if you’re able to notice his potential danger before he’s taken things irretrievably far, isn’t that better? Maybe the guy has a legitimate grievance and is going postal because he doesn’t see any other option (not that this would make it right); being able to help him find an existing remedy is definitely preferable to escalating things.
Comment by HokiePundit — January 25, 2008 #
You have a good point. Akin to Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt’s “Speak softly and carry a big stick” axiom.
I wasn’t intending to imply one should turn to lethal force as a first resort. At some point though it’s either gone too far and some people aren’t interested in negotiation. By the time the shootings started it’s too late for talking.
If you can defuse the situation prior to it spinning out of control however, more power to you. I agree that this is a tremendously better outcome.
Comment by Yuri Orlov — January 25, 2008 #